Calm Down, Dear,

...it's only the Daily Freaking Mail

Apparently, it's a 'Sad reflection of what women are like in modern society'. So, three women interviewed by some half witted Daily Mail journalist are regarded as representatives of the whole of womankind? And since when were women clones of one another? I guess some people find it hard to cope with the idea that women are *complex individuals*(1). Does relying on crass generalisations to inform one's worldview make life more easily navigable? Maybe, but I would imagine it renders one's existence somewhat tedious. You don't have to bother getting to know other people because you think you know all about them already and that doesn't sound like much fun to me.

And, remember this: If you tolerate this then your blogs will be next, will be next, will be next.

Finally, I don't know why the interviewees were shocked at the absence of fairness and balance in this story.  Frankly, I would have been shocked if a daily mail journalist were to write a fair and balanced piece.  In short, they suck.  Always have.  Always will.  Live with it and go scurrying in the opposite direction whenever you catch the slightest glimpse of a Daily Mail journalist

Warning: Some vulgarity

Which is not worthy of me:

TIP: The Daily Mail is strong and very absorbent meaning that it doubles up as extra toilet paper.

(1) And certain women should remember that this applies to men too.  Misandry is just as unpleasant as misogyny.